CVE-2024-9143
Publication date 16 October 2024
Last updated 21 October 2024
Ubuntu priority
Issue summary: Use of the low-level GF(2^m) elliptic curve APIs with untrusted explicit values for the field polynomial can lead to out-of-bounds memory reads or writes. Impact summary: Out of bound memory writes can lead to an application crash or even a possibility of a remote code execution, however, in all the protocols involving Elliptic Curve Cryptography that we're aware of, either only "named curves" are supported, or, if explicit curve parameters are supported, they specify an X9.62 encoding of binary (GF(2^m)) curves that can't represent problematic input values. Thus the likelihood of existence of a vulnerable application is low. In particular, the X9.62 encoding is used for ECC keys in X.509 certificates, so problematic inputs cannot occur in the context of processing X.509 certificates. Any problematic use-cases would have to be using an "exotic" curve encoding. The affected APIs include: EC_GROUP_new_curve_GF2m(), EC_GROUP_new_from_params(), and various supporting BN_GF2m_*() functions. Applications working with "exotic" explicit binary (GF(2^m)) curve parameters, that make it possible to represent invalid field polynomials with a zero constant term, via the above or similar APIs, may terminate abruptly as a result of reading or writing outside of array bounds. Remote code execution cannot easily be ruled out. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue.
Why is this CVE low priority?
OpenSSL developers have rated this issue to be low severity
Status
Package | Ubuntu Release | Status |
---|---|---|
edk2 | 24.10 oracular |
Needs evaluation
|
24.04 LTS noble |
Needs evaluation
|
|
22.04 LTS jammy |
Needs evaluation
|
|
20.04 LTS focal |
Needs evaluation
|
|
18.04 LTS bionic |
Needs evaluation
|
|
16.04 LTS xenial |
Needs evaluation
|
|
nodejs | 24.10 oracular |
Not affected
|
24.04 LTS noble |
Not affected
|
|
22.04 LTS jammy |
Vulnerable
|
|
20.04 LTS focal |
Not affected
|
|
18.04 LTS bionic |
Needs evaluation
|
|
16.04 LTS xenial |
Needs evaluation
|
|
14.04 LTS trusty |
Not affected
|
|
openssl | 24.10 oracular |
Needs evaluation
|
24.04 LTS noble |
Needs evaluation
|
|
22.04 LTS jammy |
Needs evaluation
|
|
20.04 LTS focal |
Needs evaluation
|
|
18.04 LTS bionic |
Needs evaluation
|
|
16.04 LTS xenial |
Needs evaluation
|
|
14.04 LTS trusty |
Needs evaluation
|
|
openssl1.0 | 24.10 oracular | Not in release |
24.04 LTS noble | Not in release | |
22.04 LTS jammy | Not in release | |
20.04 LTS focal | Not in release | |
18.04 LTS bionic |
Needs evaluation
|
References
Other references
- https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-9143
- https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20241016.txt
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/c0d3e4d32d2805f49bec30547f225bc4d092e1f4
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bc7e04d7c8d509fb78fc0e285aa948fb0da04700
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/fdf6723362ca51bd883295efe206cb5b1cfa5154
- https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/72ae83ad214d2eef262461365a1975707f862712
- https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/8efc0cbaa8ebba8e116f7b81a876a4123594d86a
- https://github.openssl.org/openssl/extended-releases/commit/9d576994cec2b7aa37a91740ea7e680810957e41